[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: node fossil
What about: plesiomorphophoroid?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The word "concestor" has already been used (e.g., in Dawkins' The
> Ancestor's Tale) for "most recent common ancestor."
> Still not a good synonym for "missing link", but close to your use of
> "shared ancestral form".
> Richard W. Travsky wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Graydon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:59:28PM +0200, David Marjanovic scripsit:
>>>>> Maybe you weren't too far off with "keystone", though.
>>>> Well, there's only one keystone in every arch... the one thing that
>>>> really annoys me about the term "missing link" is that it implies
>>>> there's _one_ link between two monolithic groups, while in reality
>>>> are long transitional series.
>>> Is there anything wrong with "shared ancestral form"?
>>> As in, "We believe that Ardi is near the shared ancestral form of modern
>>> humans and modern chimpanzees"?
>> That starts to get a bit long but does lend itself to acronymization: SAF
> Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
> Email: email@example.com Phone: 301-405-4084
> Office: Centreville 1216
> Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
> Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
> Fax: 301-314-9661
> Faculty Director, Earth, Life & Time Program, College Park Scholars
> Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
> Fax: 301-314-9843
> Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
> Department of Geology
> Building 237, Room 1117
> University of Maryland
> College Park, MD 20742 USA