[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: I Can Do New Papers All By Myself
Michael Mortimer <email@example.com> wrote:
> Note that contra this paper, the bird genus Hargeria
> (Lucas' new genus for Hesperornis gracilis) was not
> preoccupied by the crustacean genus Hargeria. Lang placed a
> species of leptocheliid tanaidacean Leptochelia rapax (named
> by Harger, 1879) into the new genus Hargeria in 1973. Lucas
> named the bird genus Hargeria in 1903 though. So for once, a
> dinosaur got to be named before its eponymous
> arthropod! Alas, Hargeria seems to be synonymous with
> Hesperornis, as Lucas only thought it was so distinct
> because he incorrectly included what would become the
> Parahesperornis alexi holotype in the species gracilis.
Bell & Everhart (2009) certainly indicate that _H. gracilis_ is much more
similar to _H. regalis_ (the type of _Hesperornis_) than to _Parahesperornis
alexi_. Previously, Martin (1984) assigned _Hargeria gracilis_ to
Nevertheless, elsewhere (e.g.,
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/birds/hesper.html) _H. gracilis_ has been
referred to _Parahesperornis_.
Now, if it turns out that _alexi_ and _gracilis_ are congeneric, the name
_Hargeria_ Lucas 1903 is available for this genus. _Hargeria_ was named before
_Parahesperornis_ (Martin 1984), so it has priority. _P. alexi_ would
therefore become _Hargeria alexi_.