[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Unfortunately, when it comes to the London specimen, the primaries and
secondaries are in disarray, and the apparent tips of the wings are unknown,
which prevents adequate association and therefore position for the different
feathers. The best preserved sequence involves the last set of secondaries,
which are about 3/4 complete from the base; primaries are just as incomplete,
and their count and positioning are difficult as the manus of each arm is
disarticulated and/or missing.
Jaime A. Headden
"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn
from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent
disinclination to do so." --- Douglas Adams (Last Chance to See)
"Ever since man first left his cave and met a stranger with a
different language and a new way of looking at things, the human race
has had a dream: to kill him, so we don't have to learn his language or
his new way of looking at things." --- Zapp Brannigan (Beast With a Billion
> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:22:56 -0600
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Archaeopteryx
> Just a short question to the list.
> Concerning the London specimen of Archie.
> Anyone out there have numbers on the length of the primaries
> and secondaries along a wing and one side of the tail??
> If so, thanking you in advance. --dale
> New! Faster Messenger access on the new MSN homepage
Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.