[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

*To*: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>*Subject*: Re: More on the genus problem*From*: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>*Date*: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:18:36 +0200*Authentication-results*: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none*In-reply-to*: <fb1cfa100909200553x66dd8875kd7f3176f528c82c5@mail.gmail.com>*References*: <bfc.623ead49.37e53292@aol.com> <78eb35330909191244u1ba57c77m63b3c55b5b928ff8@mail.gmail.com> <4AB54EDF.4040500@gmx.at> <fb1cfa100909191725m681c6206qa38e9c2b890409a6@mail.gmail.com> <4AB61106.3040303@gmx.at> <fb1cfa100909200553x66dd8875kd7f3176f528c82c5@mail.gmail.com>*Reply-to*: david.marjanovic@gmx.at*Sender*: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

L[h]erminier has had a list of many stated definitions, yes, but that hardly equates to 146 *conceptions*; many of these are the same or similar conceptions restated.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: More on the genus problem***From:*Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>

**References**:**More on the genus problem***From:*GSP1954@aol.com

**Re: More on the genus problem***From:*Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>

**Re: More on the genus problem***From:*David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

**Re: More on the genus problem***From:*John Wilkins <john.s.wilkins@gmail.com>

**Re: More on the genus problem***From:*David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

**Re: More on the genus problem***From:*John Wilkins <john.s.wilkins@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: More on the genus problem** - Next by Date:
**Re: More on the genus problem** - Previous by thread:
**Re: More on the genus problem** - Next by thread:
**Re: More on the genus problem** - Indexes: