[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Which one would be the less environment-damaging way to read papers?



Simple,

Add ->Bunks<- at the library. 72 hour reading sprees.

S!



On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Ronald Orenstein <ron.orenstein@rogers.com> wrote:

> One huge advantage I find to reading papers in e-format is that they are much 
> easier to search and retrieve that way - I attach the pdfs to entries in an 
> EndNote database - not to mention carry around when I travel.
> 
>  Ronald Orenstein
> 1825 Shady Creek Court
> Mississauga, ON L5L 3W2
> Canada
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Raptorial Talon <raptorialtalon@gmail.com>
> To: augustoharo@gmail.com
> Cc: vrtpaleo <VRTPALEO@usc.edu>; Dinosaur Mailing List <dinosaur@usc.edu>
> Sent: Mon, April 19, 2010 3:08:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Which one would be the less environment-damaging way to read  
> papers?
> 
> I would say reading it from the computer is preferable, because
> producing paper also involves using fossil fuel not just for
> manufacturing but for transporting the lumber and the finished product
> around, plus a much greater use of water and industrial chemicals for
> milling the paper itself, producing the ink, etc. Harvesting and
> preparing the raw materials for paper is a whole set of fuel-dependent
> processes that reading from a computer lacks (except for its own
> initial manufacture, but that's a very different sort of investment).
> 


--