[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Aetodactylus, the Dallas pterosaur
I may have confused you and the site of the response, although I do
not think I am crazy in this respect as a reply of the form you tend to
give was provided FOR *Zhengyuanopterus* on the apparent
non-ornithocheiroid-like nature of the teeth.
Nonetheless: You and Mark
Witton are not apparently thinking of the same thing, though, when you
write "But there are other such taxa in the Solnhofen formation, all
smaller" and Mark is thinking of apparent lonchodectids.
So to play your game, what other "taxa" in the Solnhofen, all smaller
than *Aetodactylus*, could you be thinking of?
Jaime A. Headden
The Bite Stuff (site v2)
"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)
"Ever since man first left his cave and met a stranger with a
different language and a new way of looking at things, the human race
has had a dream: to kill him, so we don't have to learn his language or
his new way of looking at things." --- Zapp Brannigan (Beast With a Billion
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 05:39:37 -0500
> From: email@example.com
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> CC: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Aetodactylus, the Dallas pterosaur
> Jumping the gun, dude. Not a ctenochasmatid. Sorry. WFTP.
> With regard to Zhenyuanopterus, Jaime, I think you have me mistaken for some
> other whipping boy.
> here's what I said here on the DML:
> Nothing here on the Hone blog:
> David Peters
> On Apr 29, 2010, at 5:15 AM, Jaime Headden wrote:
>> Forgive me if I am repeating something others know, but ornithocheiroids
>> described to date appear to have an mediolaterally expanded rostrum/mandible
>> tip. This alone is irrelevant to the specimen's affinities, if this is one
>> of the two apparent criteria being used to imploy its affinities, I would
>> consider it fascile. However, you mention also that the mandible is very
>> shallow, which would apply to this hinted-at, yet obvious Solnhofen "type"
>> of pterosaur (for the record, ctenochasmatids are apparently more widespread
>> than the Solnhofen Limestones of the Late Jurassic of Germany). If this were
>> true, you might be on firmer ground, but my records indicate that
>> ctenochasmatid mandibles appear particularly deep, although not deeper than
>> most pterosaur mandibles, and also feature unique retroarticular morphology.
>> I would also overlook this casual hand wave to the ctenochasmatids, were it
>> not for an inferrence you made to Dave Hone on the apparent identity of the
>> ornithocheiroid *Zhengyuanopterus* where the presence of long, large and
>> numerous teeth were applied as ctenochasmatic features -- *Aetodactylus* has
>> well-spaced teeth with pedunculate sockets that differentiate it from most
>> other pterosaurs, yet links it with anhanguerine-line ornithocheiroids.
>> Therefore, it is the opposite of your inferrence. Are you assessing ALL of
>> the information, or picking one bit here and there to play with?
>> Jaime A. Headden
>> The Bite Stuff (site v2)
>> "Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)
>> "Ever since man first left his cave and met a stranger with a
>> different language and a new way of looking at things, the human race
>> has had a dream: to kill him, so we don't have to learn his language or
>> his new way of looking at things." --- Zapp Brannigan (Beast With a Billion
>>> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:42:46 -0500
>>> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
>>> To: email@example.com
>>> Subject: Aetodactylus, the Dallas pterosaur
>>> Myers, Timothy S.(2010) 'A new ornithocheirid pterosaur from the Upper
>>> Cretaceous (Cenomanian- Turonian) Eagle Ford Group of Texas', Journal of
>>> Vertebrate Paleontology, 30: 1, 280 — 287
>>> I don't know of any ornithocheirid with such a dorsoventrally flattened
>>> mandible with a slight dishy curve. But there are other such taxa in the
>>> Solnhofen formation, all smaller. Methinks it's more like one of those.
>>> David Peters
>>> St. Louis
>> The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with