[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: [Spam:5.0 SpamScore] Re: Rahiolisaurus vs Indosuchus (was Re: Nomen Dubium Misuse Part II- Gwyneddosaurus
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Tim Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>Interestingly, the Rahioli abelisaur specimen ("Indosuchus") restored by
>Chatterjee and Rudra (1996) included forelimb elements that Novas et al.
>interpret as belonging to a juvenile titanosaur. So no forelimb material is
>known for _Rahiolisaurus_.
That explains a lot. I had been wondering why out of all the
abelisauroids and their ancestors (e.g. _Limusaurus_) "Indosuchus"
lacked the characteristic stubby arms.