[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: More evidence of dinosaur colors
Augusto Haro <email@example.com> wrote:
> Sorry Tim, but what makes your wagtail hypothesis more
> testable, or more or less wacky, now than in 2007?
Apparently in birds that engage in 'flush pursuits' of small prey it's not just
the behavior (wing-flashing and tail-wagging) that's important, but coloration
as well (Jablonski, 1999; Behavioral Ecology 10: 7-14). Color contrast in the
plumage plays a role - specifically the areas of the wing and tail that are
flaunted during this behavior...
>From Jablonski (1999):
"During foraging, typical flush-pursuers such as _Myioborus_ species (e.g.,
Moynihan, 1962, Ridgley and Tudor, 1989), _Setophaga ruticilla_ (Robinson and
Holmes, 1982), and most of the genus _Rhipidura_ (e.g., Holmes and Recher,
1986, Recher et al., 1985) forage with constantly half-spread wings and broadly
spread and half-raised tail exposing distinct bright patches in the tail and
wings (e.g., _M. pictus_, _S. ruticilla_) or rump (e.g., _R. rufifrons_).
[snip] Because contrast is important in eliciting insect escape responses
(e.g., Holmqvist and Srinivasan, 1991), the evolution of the flush-pursue
foraging mode has been suggested to promote selection for bright plumage in the
areas exposed during wing and tail spreading (e.g., Ficken and Ficken, 1962;
Gander, 1931; Hailman, 1960; Jabloski, 1993, 1994, 1996; Remsen and Robinson,
1990; Root, 1967)."
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com