[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Sinosauropteryx tail colors
Kris Kripchak <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Yup.. completely agree about the
> "critical mass" aspect and the
> coexisting of different types of integument. Only
> makes sense,
> especially in regards to how Xu et al frame it (I've seen
> others state
> similar and have used the elephant analogy myself).
Yep, there are two distinct issues here. In combination, they both make the
phylogenetic mapping of feather evolution very complicated:
(1) If a specimen comes preserved with a sparse or highly localized
distribution of feathers (or feather-like integumentary structures), is this
distribution real or a preservational/taphonomic artifact?
(2) If the sparse or highly localized distribution of feathers is indeed real,
does it represent the primitive condition, or is it a result of secondary loss
of a more extensive feather covering (i.e., the elephant analogy)?
> Either way, finding only a few tiny patches of
> especially in the regions where they were located, doesn't
> rule out
> Juravenator having had filamentous feathers of one variety
> or another.
Definitely. In these circumstances, absence of evidence is not necessarily
evidence of absence.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com