[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Denver Fowler <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> A new study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of
> Sciences provides yet more evidence that birds did not
> descend from ground-dwelling theropod dinosaurs, experts say, and continues
> to challenge decades of accepted theories about the evolution
> of flight.
>From the article, it looks their beef is with the "ground-dwelling"
parting, not so much the "theropod dinosaurs" part.
> PNAS has recently published widely disputed (to put it mildly) papers on
> venomous theropods, and arthropod-velvet worm hybridisation hypothesis on the
> origin of larvae. Now this. Is peer review alive and well at PNAS?
T. Michael Keesey
Technical Consultant and Developer, Internet Technologies
- Re: PNAS
- From: Jeff Hecht <email@example.com>
- Re: PNAS
- From: Tim Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- From: Denver Fowler <email@example.com>