[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
> The main problem that folks such as Ruben seem to be having
> is the notion that a dinosaurian origin of birds absolutely
> necessitates a ground-up origin of flight.
Also (in this particular case) they are ignorant of the difference between Aves
Or what bearing would a microraptorine dromaeosaur have on the evolution of
birds? It's like arguing cows (as they are generally imagined) can't exist,
since they are "supposedly" terrestrial, while whales are aquatic.
In reality, the new study just proves Barsbold's prediction of more than 25
years ago: that "ornithization" (the evolution of "bird-like" exaptations)
among maniraptorans was so widespread that an "bird-like" bauplan is quite
likely to have evolved several times independently - even though *most*
maniraptoran lineages never evolved a sufficient combination of "avian"
features to a sufficiently refined form to achieve flight.
Or, in brief: Aves monophyletic, "birds" polyphyletic.
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen
- RE: PNAS
- From: Michael Erickson <firstname.lastname@example.org>