As an aside, I do not myself benefit from Robert's copyrights. Keep in mind that this is not my library, nor even a library near my home town or where I live. Ginny asked me to sit on the Library Foundation that supports the Butler Public Library as a favor to her and offered to pay my expenses to make the trip to Butler, MO each year. I refused to take her money when she was alive and continue to refuse to do so now that she has passed on. So basically, the public benefits from Robert's and Ginny's income come with a repetitive dead expense to me -- which is how it should be.
JimC----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Taylor" <mike@indexdata.com>
To: <jrccea@bellsouth.net> Cc: <jeff@jeffhecht.com>; <dinosaur@usc.edu> Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 2:35 AM Subject: Re: Google books
Jim, it's nice for you that you happen to benefit from the work of a twenty-years dead author; but surely the mere fact that you come out of the copyright equation ahead of the game shouldn't influence whether or not you think its _right_. To pick a reductio-ad-absurdum parallel, that would be like supporting slavery because your family benefits from having slaves. Support for the current copyright regime must surely come from consideration of whether it's _right_, not ofwho benefits.