[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Unidirectional gator breathing in Science
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, Dann Pigdon <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> That very pneumaticity would have made it very difficult
> for a sauropod to submerge far enough
> for the nostrils to be under water, negating the need to
> have to hold their breath at all.
Bodysize alone would convey significant 'breath-holding' ability, even in the
absence of "pneumaticity". This begs a question; key to the 'super-buoyant
sauropod' concept is the assumption that there was no ability to voluntarily
deflate the airsacs.
Is this a safe assumption?