[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Albertaceratops pic with quills
I would like to second this.
The fact that the paper or canvas has been switched to a digital
screen and the paintings are now controlled through photoshop do not
go in detriment of the concept "painting". It is the style and
personality what counts. I don't see any difference of this painting
with whatever David was doing before he turned to the computer. I
don't see a prevalence of the computer tools over his own style.
On 21 Jan 2010, at 04:40, David Krentz wrote:
I don't want to seem too defensive but I'd say the line is
blurred :-) Computers are just new pencils as far as I'm
concerned. I "hand painted" a great deal of that image. I can
send you before and after images from the original CG render to the
finished image if you like.
Some days I draw with a pencil and sculpt with clay, other days I
do both digitally. I've been in this business long enough to know
that traditional artists make better CG artists than the other way
around. I've always loved the final result rather than the process.
On Jan 20, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Dann Pigdon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21st, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Paul P <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Nice artwork. Were you seeking criticisms..?
To quote the forum post:
"I modelled the dinosaurs in ZBrush, lit them in Vue and finished
the painting in Photoshop."
I'd say the only criticism I'd have is in the use of the word
--- On Mon, 1/18/10, David Krentz <email@example.com> wrote:
I did this painting of an Albertaceratops pair and
incorporated some of the new Trike skin impressions. I
hope the image is not too dark. I gave the male
GIS Specialist Australian Dinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia http://home.alphalink.com.au/
Visit my website