[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Fwd: NMMNH Bulletin 46 (Drepanosaurs) available
Better to read the paper first.
At 22.15 25/01/2010, you wrote:
Seems the taxonomic content of Drepanosauromorpha Renesto, Spielmann,
Lucas & Spagnoli is identical to that of Simiosauria Senter, 2004 (I
don't have the paper at my disposal now, though). Would be interesting
to check both definition cause I suspect they may be synonymous (given
the remarks of David on Drepanosaurinae / Megalancosaurinae).
2010/1/25 David Marjanovic <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>> > Megalancosaurinae = Drepanosaurus + Megalancosaurus.
> Wrong under ICZN Article 36.1.
> http://www.iczn.org/iczn/includes/page.jsp?article=36 When Drepanosauridae
> was coined, Drepanosaurinae, -ini, -ina, and -oidea were automatically
> coined with it, so Drepanosaurinae already exists and has priority over
> Megalancosaurinae. In other words, whichever subfamily of Drepanosauridae
> that contains *Drepanosaurus* must be called Drepanosaurinae. It does not
> matter at all whether the name Drepanosaurinae has ever been used in a
" Men take in great consideration what falls
within their sphere of knowledge, but they don't
realize how much it depends from what is beyond that""
Prof. Silvio Renesto
Department of Structural and Functional Biology
Università degli Studi dell' Insubria
via Dunant 3, 21100 Varese
see my Triassic website at http://dipbsf.uninsubria.it/paleo/
see my outdoor-nature photography website at