[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Leviathan melvillei -- preoccupied?

I can assure everyone here that Olivier Lambert, primary author of the study, 
has been made aware of this. Darren Naish, I'm assuming Mike Taylor, and a few 
other people have contacted him about the issue and the probability of 
requiring a replacement name. I would highly recommend going to SV-POW! for the 
jucier details of the situation, since Mike has got most of the resources and 
citations there. 



Jaime A. Headden
The Bite Stuff (site v2)

"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)

"Ever since man first left his cave and met a stranger with a
different language and a new way of looking at things, the human race
has had a dream: to kill him, so we don't have to learn his language or
his new way of looking at things." --- Zapp Brannigan (Beast With a Billion 

> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 08:36:36 -0400
> From: tholtz@umd.edu
> To: tijawi@yahoo.com
> CC: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: Leviathan melvillei -- preoccupied?
> Hey, folks! I STRONGLY encourage moving this over to VRTPALEO@usc.edu.
> Here it's just people on the outside twiddling their thumbs. There you
> will get the **authors of the work** (probably) and they might do
> something about it.
> Tim Williams wrote:
>> James Stearns  wrote:
>>> Sadly, that wouldn't be an option. Junior synonyms retain their status
>>> just in case the specimen in question actually does wind up being
>>> reinterpreted as a different genus. If that were not so, I could
>>> legitimately name a new sauropod "Brontosaurus".
>> Exactly. _Brontosaurus_ is regarded as a junior subjective synonym of
>> _Apatosaurus_, but there is a slim chance (OK, an extremely slim chance)
>> that it could one day return to usage.
>> And the ICZN is even stricter, because even junior *objective* synonyms
>> are considered to be valid names. This is the case when two or more names
>> have the same type specimen, and so there is zero chance of them being
>> different genera....
>> In the case of the name _Leviathan_, it appears that Koch originally named
>> the beastie _Levathan_ in 1841, then later changed the name to _Leviathan_
>> in a separate publication. But the ICZN would regard this as an
>> "unjustified emendation" - and as such, _Leviathan_ Koch is an objective
>> junior synonym of _Levathan_ Koch. In any case, Koch burned up a
>> perfectly good name for a genus that was a junior subjective synonym of
>> _Mammut_, the mastodon.
>> Cheers
>> Tim
> --
> Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
> Email: tholtz@umd.edu Phone: 301-405-4084
> Office: Centreville 1216
> Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
> Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
> http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/
> Fax: 301-314-9661
> Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
> http://www.geol.umd.edu/sgc
> Fax: 301-314-9843
> Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
> Department of Geology
> Building 237, Room 1117
> University of Maryland
> College Park, MD 20742 USA
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with