[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
There are no mysteries about message truncation
Bruce Woollatt wrote (ironically in a message not sent as plain text):
> For what it's worth, I seem to get intact a fair number that
> others get as truncated, Jim Farlow's included.
> I guess I'm just lucky...
If you'll glance at:
you'll see that the sample message I used to explain why some can see
the intended content of truncated messages is more than five years
old. There is nothing new to discuss here.
Mickey Rowe (MickeyPRowe@gmail.com)