[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
I'm a subscriber to the "Rare Earth" hypothesis.
The only "fossils" I would think one would have a reasonable chance of finding,
would be "chemical fossils" like the evidence for life on earth 3.8 billion
I wouldn't rule out microbial life, but I don't think you'll be finding fossils
of multicellular/macroscopic life.
--- On Mon, 6/21/10, Dann Pigdon <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: Dann Pigdon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: exopaleontology
> To: email@example.com
> Date: Monday, June 21, 2010, 9:55 PM
> On Tue, Jun 22nd, 2010 at 2:45 PM,
> "Richard W. Travsky" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, Ian Paulsen wrote:
> > > http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20100619/sc_space/robotscouldhuntforfossilsoneuropa
> > I swear I just recently read something about
> possible/potential fossil
> > sites on Mars... can't find it now, darn it...
> It seems people will search for fossils just about
> anywhere. I'd draw the line at Uranus though.
> Dann Pigdon
> Spatial Data Analyst
> Australian Dinosaurs
> Melbourne, Australia