[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Leviathan melvillei -- preoccupied?
I thought the same. Of course, I thought it was going to turn out to have
been used by an arthropod, but still...
> I have to admit when I heard the new name the first thing to pop in my
> head was: "How has no one used the name Leviathan yet?"
> "I am impressed by the fact that we know less about many modern [reptile]
> types than we do of many fossil groups." - Alfred S. Romer
> --- On Wed, 6/30/10, Mike Taylor <email@example.com> wrote:
>> From: Mike Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Subject: Leviathan melvillei -- preoccupied?
>> To: "dinosaur mailing list" <email@example.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010, 7:22 PM
>> I think the genus name Leviathan is
>> For details, including some reference chasing, see:
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology
Building 237, Room 1117
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742 USA