[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: justification for excluding lagerpetids and/or pterosaurs from a phylogenetic analysis of the Archosauria



David Peters wrote-

> Perhaps not quite alone:
>
>>From the JVP abstracts of 2008: A SUPERTREE APPROACH TO PROLACERTIFORM 
>>PHYLOGENY by SOBRAL, Gabriela, USP, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil; LANGER, Max, USP, 
>>Ribeirao Preto, Brazil "the majority consensus tree shows a paraphyletic 
>>Prolacertiformes with two major clades: the “Avicephala” clade includes, 
>>among others, drepanosaurids, Longisquama, Sharovipteryx, and Pterosauria."

This study is worthless (except for historical interest), since supertrees 
aren't useful for evaluating phylogenetic hypotheses.  When people will learn 
that, I don't know...
 
Mickey Mortimer