[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Extinct vs Disappeared
You're right. I mis-wrote.
I meant to write that in OTHER K-T boundary zones in Fort Peck area, which were
non-channeled, Archibald tended to favor the hypothesis of gradual replacement
of Cretaceous mammals with Paleocene "aspect" mammals. For what its worth, I
believe he has since come over to the Side of Light.
To my knowledge, Archibald never studied the Bug Creek beds in any great detail.
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Denver Fowler <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Extinct vs Disappeared
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:29:55 +0000 (GMT)
Phillip Bigelow wrote:
>Back in the 1980s, J.D. Archibald suggested that the Bug Creek Beds that
>"straddle" the K-T Boundary in Montana (actually, they don't straddle it at
>all, but I digress) represent a gradual replacement of "Cretaceous-aspect"
>mammals with "Paleocene-aspect" mammals.
>Archibald's hypothesis is extremely hard to prove for a variety of reasons,
>but mainly because the Bug Creek Beds are so localized that they only
>represent a small geographic area (1 mi^2 is all there is of them).
>You have to use Occam's Razor in situations like this. If you look at the Bug
>Creek Beds, their bottoms are channeled deeply into Cretaceous rocks. The
>stratigraphic relationships between the beds and the Paleocene Tullock
>formation is less clear, but the proximity of the beds to the K-T time horizon
>should be taken into account.
>The most likely scenario is that the Bug Creek Beds represent mixing of animal
>skeletons from different time periods (K and Paleocene).
The "bug creek problem" was solved by Lofgren (1985), who showed it was
Paleocene channels incising into the Hell Creek Fm, reworking and mixing the
Lofgren, Donald L. The Bug Creek Problem and the
Cretaceous-Tertiary Transition at McGuire Creek, Montana. Berkeley: University
of California Press, 1995.
Cheap Diet Help Tips. Click here.