[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: "Vide" in genus authorities?
I wonder about the below myself. Butler et al. explain Charig's thesis
at length, but in the end attribute the name *Hypselorhachis mirabilis*
exclusively to themselves, because Charig simply didn't publish, meaning
the name wasn't ever valid in his lifetime. Perhaps this is what _vide_
is good for, though Butler et al. don't use it.
Rescued from truncation:
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:53:09 -0400
From: Brad McFeeters <firstname.lastname@example.org>
For a recent case of something like this, what is the correct
nomenclatural citation of *Hypselorhachis mirabilis*? "Charig vide
Butler et al. 2009", or simply "Butler et al. 2009"?