[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Another example of narrow chord pterosaur wing on the 'net
> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:59:49 -0500
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> To: email@example.com
> CC: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Another example of narrow chord pterosaur wing on the 'net
>>> Comes down to two pertinent replies. The rest is confusion:
>> Sigh. What I'm saying is that the specimen is not clear - it does not
>> provide much useful information on the inboard wing. I am arguing for
>> uncertainty, not a specific alternative. I have provided possible wing
>> configurations in the past, and consider them plausible, but they are just a
>> few plausible attachments among many. I have seen the specimen; I disagree
>> that it is clear or useful for answering the question of wing attachment.
>> Not sure what "counteracting evidence" you want - even the blurry photo you
>> provided indicates that the inboard wing is largely missing.
> Not missing, per se, just over the torso.
and you can tell what's torso skin, what's wing skin, what's bacteria film, and
what's something else?
>> That said, I do agree that the turn to the hind limb - wherever it turned to
>> - was probably quite sharp. I expect this because the wing was narrow at
>> least to the elbow,
> whoa, whoa, if the wing was narrow to the elbow, then why are we arguing?
either over details, or past one another.
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.