[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: "Vide" in genus authorities?
Ack, my bad on the terminology. I've generally used it in the appropriate
manner, when/where I've actually cited things that may/may not have required
this (e.g., Megadontosaurus Brown vide Norell, Dingus and Gaffney, 2000).
Jaime A. Headden
"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the
experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to
do so." --- Douglas Adams (Last Chance to See)
"Ever since man first left his cave and met a stranger with a different
language and a new way of looking at things, the human race has had a dream: to
kill him, so we don't have to learn his language or his new way of looking at
things." --- Zapp Brannigan (Beast With a Billion Backs)
> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:54 -0800
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: "Vide" in genus authorities?
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Jaime Headden wrote:
>> This is an authorship that is attributed by the first name to the final
>> set of names after the vide.
> Err, other way around. That is, the author[s] before the "vide" are
> the name's authors, and the author[s] after the "vide" are the
> publication's authors.
> "Vide" basically means "by way of", I think.
> T. Michael Keesey
> Technical Consultant and Developer, Internet Technologies
> Glendale, California
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your