[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: ps: No substitute for seeing a specimen: Hone blog





----------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 16:47:17 -0700
> From: nightimeshadow@yahoo.com
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: ps: No substitute for seeing a specimen: Hone blog
>
> Even with a large number of well lit photos, I can't imagine how you could 
> possibly interpret a specimen equally well as you would when seeing it in 
> person. 
 
 I agree....I was being (silly); though, not being sure which smiley to use, I 
erred on the side of not using any.
 
apologies.
 
> --- On Sat, 5/8/10, Anthony Docimo wrote:
>
>> From: Anthony Docimo 
>> Subject: ps: No substitute for seeing a specimen: Hone blog
>> To: davidpeters@att.net, mike@indexdata.com
>> Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
>> Date: Saturday, May 8, 2010, 4:55 PM
>>
>>
>> on second thought, maybe we could all have saved oh so
>> much time and money if we had traced "Sue" and "Leonardo"
>> instead of x-raying and CAT-scanning them.
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>>> Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 22:51:46 +0000
>>> From: keenir@hotmail.com
>>> To: davidpeters@att.net;
>> mike@indexdata.com
>>> CC: dinosaur@usc.edu
>>> Subject: RE: No substitute for seeing a specimen: Hone
>> blog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> References?
>>>>
>>>> Experiments?
>>>>
>>>> Mike, with your "That's how it is" paradigm we
>> would have no relativity, no integrated baseball and the
>> earth would be the center of a tiny universe only a few
>> thousand years old.
>>>
>>> and if we trace everything, we would have no great
>> artworks.
>>>
>>>
>>>> So let's test this paradigm!
>>>>
>>>> Besides the challenge itself,
>>>
>>> what challenge? the "please don't reply to me" part?
>>>
>>>> Dr. Hone's comments were not backed up by
>> evidence. Just simple musings.
>>>
>>> it's a BLOG.
>>>
>>> musings are the whole point of blogs.
>>>
>>>> And while he can say whatever he wants to say,
>> we're all in this for the evidence. As scientists reporting
>> on science, we shouldn't be making pronouncements that we
>> can't back up. Right?
>>>
>>> in a publication, that's true. but a blog is not a
>> publication.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Hotmail has tools for t
> ttp://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get
>> more from your inbox.
>> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
>>
>
>
>                                         
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2