[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Ceratops (was RE: Glishades ericksoni, ...)
On 13 May 2010 04:40, Paul P <email@example.com> wrote:
>> _Ceratops_ is actually excluded from
>> all proposed definitions of Ceratopsidae
> ? If so, that's only because it's a nomen dubium.
> Btw, "Ceratopsinae" is not used by ceratopsian experts. They
> already and always have used Chasmosaurinae. See Dinosauria,
> Dinosaur Systematics, etc.
That may be largely true, but it's certainly not unanimous. For example,
Peter Dodson's book _The Horned Dinosaurs_ uses Ceratopsinae throughout.