[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Ceratops (was RE: Glishades ericksoni, ...)
>> Probably the best solution, since both relevant nomenclatural codes
>> (ICZN and the draft PhyloCode) require Ceratops montanus to be within
>> Ceratopsidae by definition. It does have one little drawback, and
>> that's that it potentially leaves Clade(Centrosaurus + Chasmosaurus)
>> without a name.
> Only until someone names it...
how long could it possibly go unnamed?
(or is that tempting fate - everyone waiting for someone else to name it)
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.