[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Ceratops (was RE: Glishades ericksoni, ...)





>> Probably the best solution, since both relevant nomenclatural codes
>> (ICZN and the draft PhyloCode) require Ceratops montanus to be within
>> Ceratopsidae by definition. It does have one little drawback, and
>> that's that it potentially leaves Clade(Centrosaurus + Chasmosaurus)
>> without a name.
>>
> Only until someone names it...
 
 how long could it possibly go unnamed?
 
 
(or is that tempting fate - everyone waiting for someone else to name it)
 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4