[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Flight capablities of Archie & Confucius? Not so good...
Don Ohmes <email@example.com> wrote:
> True, but don't discount trees entirely. The cycads I have
> experience with (such as Sago Palms) are VERY easy to climb,
> even w/out any "special tools". It is difficult to imagine
> that animal that size w/ a toothed beak and claws would find
> a cycad unclimbable..
Exactly. Besides, many cycads (and extinct 'cycadeoids') are/were column-like
and unbranched. So adaptations that improved an animal's ability to grasp
and/or perch would have been pointless.
Thomas <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Maybe a point which was discussed
> earlier: Islands often are "turbo chargers" for evolution (I
> heard of this first when I read the book "The Song of the
> Dodo" by David Quammen many years ago). So are feathers an
> "island invention" (e.g. Archaeopteryx)?
I've wondered if flight ability evolved to facilitate commuting between islands
("island-hopping") in the European archipelago. But since this would have
required flapping flight, and probably a "ground-up" launch as well, I've since
gone cold on the idea.