[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Nomina Dubia Part II: Rapator
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Tim Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> T. Michael Keesey <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I don't find that harsh -- what is science, if not a body
>> of knowledge gleaned from tests?
> I know a mathematician or two who would give you an argument on that. Â;-)
I know a mathematician or two who'd give you an argument if you
claimed maths is a science.
Now, the question whether questions of taxonomic judgment are
scientific is itself unscientific in David's, Jaime's, and Michael's
sense. I don't see what good anyone expects from continuing to argue
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?