[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Nomina Dubia Part II: Rapator
Rob Gay <email@example.com> wrote:
> > If this character (forked vs non-forked ischium) is not
> > taxonomically significant AND it's the ONLY character used
> > to distinguish _Archaeopteryx_ from _Shenzhouraptor_....
> > then yes, we would synonymize the two.<
> What is your test for determining if a character is
> taxonomically significant? Wouldn't its significance only be
> determined after putting the character into a cladistic
> analysis? How do you make the determination yourself?
Ummm... just to be clear, I was responding to a completely hypothetical
question raised by Mickey M. I was in no way advocating synonymizing
_Shenzhouraptor_ with _Archaeopteryx_. Neither was Mickey.
However, I would advocate synonymizing _Shenzhouraptor_ under _Jeholornis_...
but that's another story. :-)