[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Upstroke of *Archaeopteryx* and *Confuciusornis* was Re: Science feather strength debate
David Marjanovic <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Archie further lacks an ossified sternal keel, and so do most specimens of
> *Confuciusornis*. Tim Williams has way exaggerated what *C.* has: Chiappe et
> al. (1999) counted _two_ specimens that had a faint ridge on the caudal half
> of the sternum, out of several hundred; in all others, the sternum is
> completely flat.
The situation is potentially more complicated, because Chiappe et al.
(1999) raise the prospect that this bony ridge might have anchored a
larger, cartilaginous keel. If this is the case, then it implies that
a cartilaginous keel was present in all _Confuciusornis sanctus_.
So although it is true that only two _C. sanctus_ specimens (GMV-2147
& SMFAv-423) show a bony 'keel' (more of a sagittal ridge), the
flesh-and-blood animals might have had a substantially larger keel
made out of cartilage. Only in some animals was the bony anchor point