[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Science feather strength debate
On 11/4/2010 9:14 AM, Mike Habib wrote:
Not to mention that asymmetrical feathers are not actually required for flight,
from a first principles standpoint, despite the now popular notion that there
must be a 1:1 correspondence.
On Nov 4, 2010, at 7:19 AM, David Marjanovic<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
The asymmetrical vanes of the remiges and rectrices of
_Archaeopteryx_ suggest some kind of aerial capability. But not
necessarily powered flight, because _Microraptor_ has them too.
Of course, the only argument against *Microraptor* being a powered flier is the
same one that holds for *Archaeopteryx* and *Confuciusornis*: its shoulder
However, some flightless birds retain asymmetrical vanes (e.g.,
Oho. Reference, please?
The fact that some flightless birds *retain* asymmetrical vanes should
not negatively affect the status of asymmetrical vanes as indicators of