[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Science feather strength debate
You just called me unscientific. Yet you used these terms: "duh, --
hello -- can't some of you read?"
Is that somehow a contradiction? Insults are orthogonal to science.
Please, for all the readers of the DML, define the scientific process
as you understand it. And, while doing so, please explain why no one
in the world can reproduce your results, and why no authors are
allowed by their editors to cite your work in peer - reviewed
Is that the case? How many editors do you know?
A little bird called "Avisaurus" told me that.
That looks like an allusion which, in turn, looks a lot like an _ad
hominem_ argument. Being a logical fallacy, it's not scientific;
everyone can agree on that.