[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Science feather strength debate
On Nov 12, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Jason Brougham wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Don Ohmes wrote:
>> On 11/12/2010 11:24 AM, Jason Brougham wrote:
>>> Only kiwis and other terrestrial ratites, probably.
>> Are you sure kiwis can't? Have their joints "reverted" to the constrained
>> condition? That would be very big news, imo, and even outside the realm of
>> pure speculation. Mind if I poll the list for info on that?
> No, I'm not sure. It's just a guess. I'll look into it.
>>> But, as I say, Meinzer spent months doing fieldwork with them, and he
>>> reported that Roadrunners don't flap as they leap into the trees, and he
>>> has three or so photographs showing them vaulting upwards with tightly
>>> folded wings.
>> 8' vertical in a single bound, zero flap? Er, cue polite skepticism...
>> Granted, the scamps have some groovy little legs. But that is a lot of
>> body-lengths, and wings are good/necessary to stabilize when on a perch in
>> any case.
> I know, that's what amazed me, too. I can't guarantee that they really leap
> up a full 8 feet, but Mienzer's photos seem to place the above his head.
>> Anyhow, if they aint flapping, where is the relevance to wing evolution?
>> "Ground-forage, tree-sleep" is definitely a viable lifestyle.
> The ancestral form, which had rudimentary wings for brooding the nest, and
> which could fold them tightly to prevent impediments to running (as per Hopp
> and Orsen, in Feathered Dragons, 2004) could have leapt up into trees to
> roost and/or forage when they were not breeding. Then these nesting wings
> could have become exapted, and undergone selection for parachuting down from
> the roosts (it would just save time and calories if they could jump down from
> tree crowns rather than climb down, allowing them to forage in trees with
> less expenditure of energy). From there, further strengthening, lengthening,
> and streamlining of the wings and feathers could eventually allow gliding,
> then flapping, and this lineage may have increased the proportion of time
> they spent foraging in trees proportionately.
> This may have some support from the fact that Archaeopteryx's toe phalangeal
> proportions show that it corresponds to birds which forage both on the ground
> and in trees. When I did some back of the envelope calculations using
> Hopson's phalangeal method (New Perspectives on the Origin and Evolution of
> Birds) I found that Microraptor's proportions were terrestrial, but near the
> overlap with arboreal birds. I also found that Anchiornis came out close to
> vultures, which feed primarily on the ground, but also roost.
>> Cycads (thinking Sago Palm here) are highly climbable (and perch-able)
>> BTW... like I had a dog that could do that once, when motivated w/ a frisbee.
> No kidding? That is pretty cool.
> Jason Brougham
> Senior Principal Preparator
> American Museum of Natural History
> (212) 496 3544
Senior Principal Preparator
American Museum of Natural History
(212) 496 3544