[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Science feather strength debate
Scott Hartman <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Still, I think it has to be addressed because without fail every published
> estimation on the flight and gliding capabilities of Archaeopteryx
> assume a priori that it had a derived wing; that falsely reduces the
> actual range of error (and I would argue introduces significant
> additional error) into attempts to model the aerodynamic properties of
_Archaeopteryx_'s flight abilities remind me of a quote from Toy
Story: "That's not flying. It's falling with style."
> Indeed, I don't believe it would be except that we're stuck with a
> century of protobirds-as-flying-squirrel-analogs (and a litany of
> accompanying illustrations) as conceptual baggage.
Thankfully this boilerplate is fading into oblivion. Slowly, but
surely (I hope).
P.S. Thanks to those who informed me off-list that the word
"refudiate" was invented/concocted by Sara Palin. I knew this; I was
just being cute when I was claiming ignorance about who came up with
it. If nothing else, Sara Palin demonstrates that _Alaskacephale_ was
not the last bonehead from Alaska.