[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Lack of Running Giant Theropod Tracks
Don, I am simply not going to bother engaging with you until you give
evidence that you have read and understood Alexander (1985:21-22) and
Alexander (1989:30-34), and that you have new evidence that shows how
and where Alexander was mistaken. All I am seeing at the moment is
your own preconceptions stated as fact. If you've got more than that,
great: I am all ears.
On 29 November 2010 14:58, Don Ohmes <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 9:38 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:
>> Yes. Do the math (or read Alexander, who did it a decades ago).
> As the elephants happily prove, that math is not applicable here. Swamp does
> not = water, or even a theoretical uniform mud.
> Cycling a leg through mud changes and redistributes the solid and liquid
> components. Heavy stuff sinks, and the upper part of the column becomes less
> dense. Long legs and power rule.
> Long legs can also reach underlying sediments that are firmer than the
> overlying soft stuff.
> Those seds are there in most places. When they are not, you can swim through
> mud, if you have enough power.
> When your water buffalo gets stuck, you go get an elephant to pull him out.
> If your elephant gets stuck -- well, too bad you do not have a sauropod.
> In a very large animal, webbed feet would a tremendous disadvantage in a
> tree-filled swamp and also render dry ground travel impossible.