[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Stegosaur volume of Swiss Journal of Geosciences
David Marjanovic wrote-
> The problem, as I see it, is that the ICZN sees it the other way around.
> *S. armatus* cannot be _referred_ to *Stegosaurus*, it _is_
> *Stegosaurus* _by definition_. The question is whether *S. _stenops_*
> can be referred to *S.*.
> ...and if so, on what criteria. After all, the ICZN does not require
> genera to be monophyletic; it requires diagnoses, but those diagnoses
> don't need to contain any apomorphies.
> Is it impossible to reliably distinguish *S. armatus* from at least two
> other named species that can be distinguished from each other? Then it's
> a nomen dubium, and AFAIK *S.* as a whole is a nomen dubium, too, and so
> is Stegosauridae. I'll look this up in the ICZN sometime.
I'd like to know where it says that in the ICZN. I wouldn't doubt the ICZN
says a genus needs a valid species to be valid itself, but "valid" in the ICZN
generally refers to nomenclatural validity (as in if the name follows the ICZN
rules and thus is not a nomen nudum). The only references to nomen dubia
and/or indeterminate specimens I see are-
"Introduction 8. If the existing name-bearing type of a species-group
taxon is indeterminate, so that the correct application of the name to a
particular taxon is doubtful (i.e. the name is a nomen dubium), an author
should request the Commission to set it aside and designate a neotype."
"75.5. Replacement of unidentifiable name-bearing type by a neotype.
When an author considers that the taxonomic identity of a nominal
species-group taxon cannot be determined from its existing name-bearing
type (i.e. its name is a nomen dubium), and stability or
universality are threatened thereby, the author may request the
Commission to set aside under its plenary power [Art. 81] the existing
name-bearing type and designate a neotype."
So really, S. armatus should get a neotype instead of S. stenops being made the
new Stegosaurus type. If we were following the ICZN that is.