[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Striking a blow against the predatory guilds

Agreed. Look at areas where large predators have already been mostly removed 
from the ecosystem, for example any highly populated part of the northeastern 
US. Deer and Canadian goose populations have exploded thanks to the treatment 
of any wild cat or canid species as dangerous. Bears too, for the most part. 
With increasing population and decreasing habitat, the deer end up turning to 
gardens for food, which in turn causes humans to plant more non-native 'deer 
resistant' species and use deer repellant chemicals. The end result is a lot of 
starving deer - not a morally superior argument in my opinion!

Michelle Pinsdorf

--- On Mon, 9/20/10, Lee Hall <paleeoguy@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Lee Hall <paleeoguy@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Striking a blow against the predatory guilds
> To: koreke77@yahoo.de
> Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Date: Monday, September 20, 2010, 8:30 AM
> "...it would be instrumentally good
> if predatory animal species were
> to become extinct and replaced by new herbivorous species,
> provided
> that this could occur without ecological upheaval involving
> more harm
> than would be prevented by the end of predation."
> He hasn't really thought this through all the way has
> he?  That last
> part of his thought above shows just how poorly he
> understands
> population ecology.  Herbivores, without natural
> predators, would not
> exist in some Eden-like state (complete with cherubs and
> pan flutes)
> and would certainly require culling.  So what's more
> horrific: natural
> predators processing animals into carcasses and introducing
> nutrients
> into an ecosystem, or do we want another 1800's style Bison
> slaughter?
> Lee Hall
> Paleontology Undergraduate
> Museum of the Rockies
> Montana State University
> Bozeman, MT
> lhall@montana.edu
> http://sites.google.com/site/leehallpaleo/Home