[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Stegosaur volume of Swiss Journal of Geosciences
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Michael Mortimer
> As for Dryptosauroidea (Deinodontoidea has even more priority, btw),
> Podokesauridae/oidea and all the other examples that are ignored
> nowdays, they annoy me.Â I think we should either switch names or
> petition the ICZN instead of letting these technically correct names
> float around unused.
There is another way out. All zoological superfamily names end in
"-oidea", but not all names ending in "-oidea" are for zoological
superfamilies. Examples: Asteroidea (Class), Hyracoidea (Order). So
use "Tyrannosauroidea", but don't rank it as a superfamily. Rank it as
a parvorder or whatever, or just don't rank it at all. Problem solved.
T. Michael Keesey
Technical Consultant and Developer, Internet Technologies