[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Foraminacephale gen. nov.
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Foraminacephale gen. nov.
- From: Mike Taylor <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:29:15 +0100
- Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <CA+nnY_EHjEeMrindf9XWDT=LZy8igOSTEVrG6P43n9ahCr2kDg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAKcPz1fc9C=QhOyX2pOs=y85WXssjFHStm-wo+js-2uMimm5=A@mail.gmail.com> <SNT127-W631CBBF673B84D7605C6E4E7370@phx.gbl> <4E33EDBE.email@example.com> <CA+nnY_EHjEeMrindf9XWDT=LZy8igOSTEVrG6P43n9ahCr2kDg@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu
On 1 August 2011 05:05, Tim Williams <email@example.com> wrote:
>> That said, such situations can happen when a description has been validly
>> published, too. The temnospondyl *Doleserpeton*, very important for the
>> origin of Lissamphibia, was described in John Bolt's PhD thesis in 1964 and
>> published in a three-page Science paper in 1969, and then Bolt sat on the
>> material and apparently didn't let anyone look at it. Papers on the teeth
>> came out in 1977 and 1979, one on the supposed middle ear in 1985, and a few
>> more bits and pieces in 1991, but that's it. Only when his PhD student Trond
>> Sigurdsen became involved, publication resumed: occiput and braincase in
>> 2008, forelimb in 2009, full description in 2010.
> Sounds a little like the history of _Protoavis_, in at least one
> respect. (Although I don't mean to imply that _Protoavis_ is as
> potentially important to avian origins as _Doleserpeton_ is to
> lissamphibian origins... only that the amount of accessibility to the
> fossil material has not helped the scientific process.)
And I had a Jobaria flashback when I read the Doleserpeton account.
Initially "described", if you want to call it that, in about one and a
half pages of a 1999 _Science_ paper, we are now twelve years into the
looong wait for ANY further published information on that animal.
Sadly, this is not even an isolated case.