[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:36 AM, evelyn sobielski <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> If this is correct, there should be a lot of recent neontological literature
> that uses Aves and Neornithes synonymously. There isn't. At a cursory glance,
> I could not find ANY post-phenetics neontological study where "modern
> birds/crown birds" = Aves.
I would guess that "Neornithes" is usually not even mentioned.
> But for most other competitors now (post-_Xiaotingia_) Aves = Paraves for
> practical purposes.
No, _Eumaniraptora_. (_Paraves_ is branch-based. IIRC _Graciliraptor_
was originally found to be a non-eumaniraptoran paravian.)
> Re Tim: I wouldn't use Hesperornithes/ _Hesperornis regalis_ to delimit
> *anything* except their own lineage, considering the experience with
Is that really still relevant?
T. Michael Keesey