[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy" + paper requests
2011/8/4 David Černý <email@example.com>:
> Mike Keesey <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I would guess that "Neornithes" is usually not even mentioned.
> Surprisingly, that is not the case. I have searched for the name
> _Neornithes_ in papers on molecular phylogenetics (what's more
> neontological than that?) and it is used quite frequently. I've found
> it in Groth & Barrowclough (1999), van Tuinen et al. (2000), Cracraft
> et al. (2004), Fain & Houde (2004), Ericson et al. (2006 -- as
> "neornithine birds"), Brown et al. (2008), and Wright et al. (2008).
I stand corrected.
T. Michael Keesey