[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy" + paper requests



2011/8/4 David Černý <david.cerny1@gmail.com>:
> Mike Keesey <keesey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would guess that "Neornithes" is usually not even mentioned.
>
> Surprisingly, that is not the case. I have searched for the name
> _Neornithes_ in papers on molecular phylogenetics (what's more
> neontological than that?) and it is used quite frequently. I've found
> it in Groth & Barrowclough (1999), van Tuinen et al. (2000), Cracraft
> et al. (2004), Fain & Houde (2004), Ericson et al. (2006 -- as
> "neornithine birds"), Brown et al. (2008), and Wright et al. (2008).

I stand corrected.
-- 
T. Michael Keesey
http://tmkeesey.net/