[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"... but Jeholornis is (not!)

No, Jeholornis isn't a bird.  Niether are enantiornithines.  None of
them are near the crown.  They're just protobirds which better
approximate actual birds as they approach the crown group.


On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:13 PM, evelyn sobielski <koreke77@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Thanks for the paper David!
> I say: wow. _Jeholornis_? Just: wow. They couldn't get it out of Avialae with 
> the taxon set they used, no matter how?
> Now this is starting to look *really* interesting... bearing in mind that it 
> is (with Archie removed from Avialae) at least 10-20 Ma past the origin of 
> any "pygostylian" lineage. Probably somewhat more, but not outlandishly more 
> (perhaps closer to 50 Ma than to 10, but unlikely to be closer to 100 than to 
> 50).
> Provided its position here is correct.
> In any case http://www.springerlink.com/content/wln3pa4ttec4h6td/ is probably 
> well worth a re-read now.
> I have the PDF in case anyone needs it.
> And someone who has the data lying around might really want to throw 
> _Dalianraptor/Jixiangornis/Yandangornis/Zhongjianornis_, and perhaps 
> _Zhongornis_ into that matrix and run it. I suspect if this is done, 
> something strange, brilliant or both will happen.
> Regards,
> Eike

Scott Hartman
Scientific Advisor/Technical Illustrator
(307) 921-9750
website: www.skeletaldrawing.com
blog: http://skeletaldrawing.blogspot.com/