[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"... but Jeholornis is
evelyn sobielski <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the paper David!
You're welcome :o)
> I say: wow. _Jeholornis_? Just: wow. They couldn't get it out of Avialae with
> the taxon set they used, no matter how?
I was also surprised by that. On second thought, whatever characters
have linked _Jeholornis_ and living birds to the exclusion of
_Archaeopteryx_ until now, they remain just as valid as before. For
example, _Jeholornis_ did not have a hyperextendible second toe, did
it? If archaeopterygids are deinonychosaurs, is this character an
autapomorphy of _Deinonychosauria_ again?
> In any case http://www.springerlink.com/content/wln3pa4ttec4h6td/ is probably
> well worth a re-read now.