[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Brrr, bone chilling paleopolar summers(Polar dinosaur growth and other new papers)
I'm curious how we can derive such detailed paleoclimate models that
allow estimates of seasonal temps in specific locales. In another
currently popular thread on bird, err, Aves, phylogeny I read about the
difficulty in dealing with "species" for paleontological datasets. What
kind of testable hypotheses do paleoclimate models provide? It seems to
this casual observer that information in the fossil record on the
climate of a particular environment is tied, at least in part, to
information on the numbers and types of "species" in the environment.
Please pardon my ignorance. Does sedimentology or some other
non-biological record provide additional useful information to describe
Ar 8/6/2011 4:21 PM, scríobh Jura:
----- Original Message -----
To: GSP1954@aol.com; email@example.com
Sent: Saturday, 6 August 2011 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: Brrr, bone chilling paleopolar summers(Polar dinosaur growth and
other new papers)
So, living conditions sound considerably better in polar Alaska 65 MYA than here
in the Northeast Kingdom of Vermont USA, where the average ANNUAL temperature is
39.5 F and the winters have been known to get as low as 40 below zero...no
bradyenergetic crocs here either.
High Mountain Writers' House
No crocs, but seven turtles, one lizard and eleven snakes.
Then there are the more northerly countries like Sweden, Denmark and Finland.
Their average temperatures are substantially more harsh than Alaska, or
Victoria would have been in the Cretaceous, and all of them house
bradymetabolic reptiles, amphibians, fish, and insects.
I'd bet dollars to donuts that the only reason we haven't found "classic
reptiles" in the North Slope is because we haven't been looking that hard for them.