[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"... but Jeholornis is (not!))
GSPaul <GSP1954@aol.com> wrote:
> Cladistic analysis did not
> settle the issue for many years. Then more and more transitional fossils
> showed up, combined with molecular studies [...]
...which were cladistic as well. Is it only morphological cladistics
that bothers you?
> it's really the fossils that count.
No doubt about that -- the question is how to extract phylogenetic
information from them.