[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Ah ha! That's where therizinosaurs came from
> OK, I take your word for it that moas spanned the same range of body size as
> Microraptor Zhaoianus and Utahraptor, and had morphologies as different as
> Balaur and Mahakala.
> I guess my point here is that there are differences, and as far as global
> distribution it sounds like we agree. Whether they are meaningful differences
> that falsify the BCF hypothesis is a much more complex matter and, I admit,
> the difference in global distribution, alone, is not a very strong argument.
> How old are the first moas, any idea? Because dromaeosaur teeth are known
> from the Jurassic and go right up to the KT.
> On Aug 9, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Ronald Orenstein wrote:
>> Leave out "achieved worldwide distribution" and the moas come pretty close.
>> Ronald Orenstein
>> 1825 Shady Creek Court
>> Mississauga, ON L5L 3W2
>> From: Jason Brougham <email@example.com>
>> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Cc: DML <email@example.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2011 4:57:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: Ah ha! That's where therizinosaurs came from
>> Yes, let's keep the point in mind: that no family of ratites or other
>> flightless crown group birds that I am aware of has become flightless,
>> achieved the morphological distinction of a new family, and then radiated
>> widely, diversified, achieved a range of body sizes spanning two orders of
>> magnitude, and achieved global distribution, in the way that dromaeosaurs
>> did, if we assume that BCF is true.
>> On Aug 9, 2011, at 4:26 PM, David Marjanovic wrote:
>> >> >> Secondly, failure of any recent group of flightless birds to
>> >> >> spread over the world is in part due to the recent positioning of
>> >> >> the continents (ie there are oceans in the way). Presumably
>> >> >> flightless birds have only dispersed over a land connection (I
>> >> >> can't think offhand of an example of a flightless bird spreading
>> >> >> by, say, rafting).
>> >> >
>> >> > Gondwana and Lauarsia were separated, but they shared several
>> >> > groups of maniraptorans in common.
>> > That separation only came about in the Late Jurassic and was rather
>> > intermittent. In contrast, I don't think there ever was a unitary Laurasia
>> > that wasn't cut in two by various seas through Europe.
>> >> >> Third, the fauna of mammalian predators and nest-robbers has been
>> >> >> quite different since the K-T from what it was earlier, and the
>> >> >> barriers to radiation of flightless birds on continents may not
>> >> >> therefore be identical to what they might have been in the
>> >> >> Mesozoic.
>> >> >
>> >> > Different, certainly, but there is no reason to think the
>> >> > differences were consequential. Mammals were feeding on dinosaurs
>> >> > in the Mesozoic, they could glide, they could swim, no reason to
>> >> > think they couldn't rob nests.
>> > Never mind nest robbers. It now seems that the flightless paleognaths
>> > became flightless in the early Paleocene on the continents as if they were
>> > islands -- due to the lack of big predators after the K-Pg mass extinction.
>> >> > But, in the case of rails, the morphological changes
>> >> > associated with flightlessness were so recent and superficial that
>> >> > the resulting species did not move into new families, unlike with
>> >> > the ratites. In maniraptorans we had, I guess, Troodontidae and
>> >> > Dromaeosauridae that Paul might say descended from Archaepterygids,
>> >> > though he may group them all in the same family.
>> > Isn't that just a matter of time? Let those flightless rails sit on their
>> > islands for 30 million years (...longer than most of the islands in
>> > question will exist, but never mind...) and then tell me what ranks you'd
>> > assign to them.
>> Jason Brougham
>> Senior Principal Preparator
>> American Museum of Natural History
>> (212) 496 3544
> Jason Brougham
> Senior Principal Preparator
> American Museum of Natural History
> (212) 496 3544
Senior Principal Preparator
American Museum of Natural History
(212) 496 3544