[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dilophosaurus



On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:47 AM,  <GSP1954@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Avepoda cannot be identical to Theropoda unless the later is defined to
> exclude every single basal theropod with a metatarsal I that contacts the
> ankle.

Right, exactly.

Are there known, definite non-avepod theropods? My impression is that
the possible ones might also be non-eusaurischian saurischians.

-- 
T. Michael Keesey
http://tmkeesey.net/