[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Mike Keesey <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> (Avepoda was originally
>> proposed as a replacement name for Theropoda.
> No, Avepoda is apomorphy-based, so it's a clade within Theropoda,
> which is branch-based. (Of course, the known content may be identical,
> but that could easily change.)
I could be wrong (I usually am), but I had a vague recollection that
"Avepoda" was first proposed in PDW.