[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Alamosaurus as biggest North American sauropod
Jaime Headden <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The best strategy, in my opinion, is to simply do away with crap taxa.
I think this is a bit harsh. If there is evidence for only one
sauropod taxon in a given provenance (region/locality/horizon/bed),
then that sauropod should be given the oldest available name. Names
like _Astrodon_ and _Alamosaurus_ deserve to be kept around - and
arguably _Titanosaurus_ does as well, IMHO. If the survival of "crap
taxa" requires the designation of a neotype, then so be it.
Sometimes it is necessary to do away with time-honored names that are
based on crap type material. This has happened for _Deinodon_ and
_Trachodon_, and I think this fate is inevitable for _Troodon_. But
it shouldn't be the default setting for any and all names.